ArcelorMittal, thyssenkrupp Steel and voestalpine call for pragmatic ETS reform, to secure the competitiveness of European steelmaking and help to accelerate decarbonisation

Three of Europe’s leading steelmakers - ArcelorMittal Europe, thyssenkrupp Steel, and voestalpine – are today issuing a joint call for urgent, pragmatic reform of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), warning that without adjustments the current trajectory risks destroying Europe’s industrial base.
In an article published in the Financial Times, ArcelorMittal executive chairman Lakshmi Mittal articulated the companies’ shared position on how the ETS needs to be reconsidered, to safeguard European steelmaking and all the industries it serves.
Together, the three companies represent around 60% of Europe’s integrated steel production, placing them at the heart of the EU’s industrial value chains. All three have committed to decarbonising their operations, but stressed that the policy framework must enable, not inhibit, these transformations of the steelmaking process.
ETS costs rising, without enablers in place
The three companies note that while the ETS has driven emissions reductions in the power sector (by about 49% between 2005 and 2023), it is not yet delivering a viable pathway for energy intensive industries such as steel. Key enablers for economic decarbonisation remain insufficiently developed or unavailable at scale, including competitive electricity prices, affordable green hydrogen, Carbon Contracts for Difference, carbon capture and storage, and lead markets for low carbon steel.
Under the current EU ETS framework, the cost of producing steel in the EU is expected to increase by around 50% by the early 2030s. With steel-intensive imports not subject to an equivalent carbon cost, and EU steel exports receiving no rebate to recover the carbon cost, the implications of the sharp increase in ETS costs will be profound for European steelmaking and the entire value chain.
A risk to Europe’s manufacturing backbone
The three companies estimate that without reforms to the ETS, the EU could face a 30–40% decline in steel intensive manufacturing activity, putting up to 5 million jobs at risk across the value chain.
Such an outcome would run counter to the EU’s ambition, which is set out in the Industrial Accelerator Act, to increase manufacturing’s share of GDP to 20% and would weaken Europe’s economic resilience at a time of intensifying global competition significantly.
Pause ETS cost increases until decarbonisation is economically viable
ArcelorMittal, thyssenkrupp Steel and voestalpine emphasise that they fully support Europe’s climate objectives and want to decarbonise. However, the ETS must be adapted to reflect the realities of industrial transformation.
The companies are jointly calling for:
A temporary pause in ETS cost escalation, maintaining the current level until the key enablers of economically viable decarbonisation are in place.
A framework that ensures first movers are supported, enabling early decarbonisation projects to proceed with confidence. ETS revenues should be directed toward industrial decarbonisation, ensuring funds accelerate the transition.
A balanced approach to import and export competitiveness, addressing the unintended consequences of the current system.
The recent introduction of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and the upcoming Tariff Rate Quotas are important steps toward a level playing field. But the companies stress that ETS reform is the final piece of the puzzle needed to ensure Europe can both decarbonise and maintain a strong industrial base.
Marie Jaroni, CEO of thyssenkrupp Steel said: “The ETS needs a reality check. It does not reflect the current state of Europe’s industry, where competitiveness and transformation are becoming increasingly difficult to reconcile. That is why we need a cost pause in the ETS to safeguard the transformation and ensure that ‘first movers’ like us are not put at a disadvantage. The reform must help successfully bring climate protection and industrial development together for the future of Europe.”
Herbert Eibensteiner, CEO of voestalpine AG, said: “voestalpine is making significant investments through its greentec steel program and will drastically reduce emissions in the coming years. However, in a challenging economic environment, the phase-out of free allocation is already diverting financial resources needed for the decisive phase of transformation. A pause in the ETS framework, until enabling conditions are in place, is essential to safeguard these investments and enable further decarbonization steps.”
Lakshmi Mittal, executive chairman of ArcelorMittal, said:
“A future for the ETS that incentivises decarbonisation without compromising competitiveness must be found. It is not an easy problem to solve, but reform of the ETS is essential and we applaud Europe’s policymakers for putting the topic back on the agenda. The choice they face is not between climate ambition and competitiveness. The choice is between a climate strategy that strengthens Europe’s resilience and economic security, and one that hollows it out”.


